 Political and economic alternatives for the Central and East European Region and ChinaGlobal Business and Economics Review, 2007, vol. 9, issue 1, 101-122 Abstract: A successful transition process may be treated as a tool for the economic development of a country. There is a common consensus that the implication of a market-oriented transition might be deemed as a political development because of the robust relationship existing between the political and economic reforms. Studying the reform policies in a democracy and/or in a market economy, we observed both similar and different characteristics among transition procedures, institutional reforms and macroeconomic performance among the countries in question. Thus, we introduced nine general reform paths with regard to the way that the reform from communism to democracy and/or to market economy was achieved. We concluded that countries, which have followed or were forced to follow reform paths, such as the disguised, belligerent and violent, have limited economic growth and not only lag behind the other transition countries in the region, but also, as of today, have not even reached the levels they had attained in 1989. Keywords: transition economies; democracy; institutional reforms; economic development; political development; reform policies; market economies; China; Eastern Europe; Central Europe. (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:gbusec:v:9:y:2007:i:1:p:101-122 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Global Business and Economics Review from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to econpapers@oru.se.
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.