The interpretation differences of verbal probability expressions in principles-based accounting standards: evidence from China

Fengchun Tang and Ling Yang

International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 2016, vol. 12, issue 3, 287-312

Abstract: This study examines whether verbal probability expressions (VPEs) in principles-based accounting standards are understood and interpreted consistently by Chinese accounting professionals and students. We gathered data from auditors working in Chinese public accounting firms, accounting professionals not employed by Chinese public accounting firms, and Chinese accounting students. The results indicate that Chinese auditors exhibit a high degree of consensus in their VPE interpretations. However, preparer and student interpretations tend to vary more and exhibit lower levels of consensus. In addition, there are evidences showing that small differences in the translation of VPEs can have a significant unintended impact on the interpretations of these expressions in accounting standards.

Keywords: verbal probability expressions; principles-based standards; International Financial Reporting Standards; IFRS; China; interpretation differences; accounting standards. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=77893 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:12:y:2016:i:3:p:287-312

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().