Audit effectiveness preceding bankruptcy in UK financial institutions

Charles A. Malgwi and Emmanuel N. Emenyonu

International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 2004, vol. 1, issue 4, 503-518

Abstract: This study investigates audit effectiveness (or the lack thereof) of audit opinions issued by auditors preceding company bankruptcies. Data from all 26 bankrupt UK financial institutions were used to determine if auditors appropriately issued opinions other than unqualified, as signs of non-going concern, and any differences in audit-opinion effectiveness between international and domestic audit firms. Results show that unqualified opinions issued was significantly higher than other opinions prior to bankruptcy. While international audit firms were less likely to issue unqualified opinions than their domestic counterparts, no firm issued adverse or disclaimer of opinions in any given year, despite serious warning signals from return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE) and current ratios.

Keywords: audit effectiveness; bankruptcy; going concerns; audit opinion; UK financial institutions. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=6359 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:1:y:2004:i:4:p:503-518

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().