Materialism and materiality

Michael K. Shaub

International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 2005, vol. 2, issue 4, 347-355

Abstract: Accountants and auditors in recent financial scandals have been pictured as materialistic, simply calculating consequences and ignoring duties. This paper potentially explains this apparently materialistic behaviour in what has historically been a truthtelling profession. Materiality, which drives audit priorities, has been institutionalised in accounting and auditing standards. But a materiality focus inherently implies that all amounts that are not 'materially' misstated are equally true. This leads to habitual immaterial misstatements and promotes the view that auditors do not care about truth at all. Auditors' lack of commitment to truth undermines their claim to be professionals in the classic sense.

Keywords: materiality; materialism; consequentialist; truth telling; auditor ethics; accountants; auditors; standards; accounting; auditing. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=9591 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:2:y:2005:i:4:p:347-355

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().