Value relevance of alternative methods of accounting for actuarial gains and losses

Ana Isabel Morais

International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 2012, vol. 8, issue 1, 69-90

Abstract: In 2010, IASB published an exposure draft about defined benefit plans where it proposed to eliminate the deferred recognition of actuarial gains and losses. IASB aimed to make fundamental improvements to the recognition, presentation and disclosures of defined benefit plans by mid-2011. To shed light on the debate on the recognition of actuarial gains and losses of defined benefit plans, this paper investigates the value relevance of financial information under three alternative methods of recognising actuarial gains and losses allowed by IAS 19: employee benefits (2004): the profit or loss method, the equity recognition method and the corridor method. Findings suggest that the equity recognition method, i.e., the recognition of all actuarial gains and losses in equity, best reflects the market's valuation of actuarial gains and losses of defined benefit plans.

Keywords: actuarial gains; actuarial losses; corridor method; equity recognition; defined benefit plans; pensions; value relevance; alternative accounting methods; financial information. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=43966 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijaape:v:8:y:2012:i:1:p:69-90

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().