Economics at your fingertips  

Some considerations on how often safety critical valves should be tested

Alireza M. Gelyani, Eirik Bjorheim Abrahamsen, Frank Asche and Seth Guikema

International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management, 2015, vol. 6, issue 1, 59-67

Abstract: The regulation given by the Petroleum Safety Authority Norway (PSAN) requires annual testing of safety critical valves. In the present paper we discuss the rationale for this requirement, as annual testing by the operators is considered as too strict. We also show, using expected utility theory as the basis for the discussion, that, at the same time, it is too simplistic in that it focuses on too few parameters. We show that the requirement of annual testing likely will be too strict also from a societal point of view if the objective of annual testing is only improvements in reliability of the valves. One is then disregarding the fact that testing of safety critical valves also has negative effects on safety for those who perform the tests, as well as negative effects for the environment.

Keywords: safety critical valves; expected utility theory; annual testing; risk acceptance criterion; petroleum safety; reliability improvement; Norway; oil industry. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Business Continuity and Risk Management from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Series data maintained by Darren Simpson ().

Page updated 2017-09-29
Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbcrm:v:6:y:2015:i:1:p:59-67