 The impact of cognitive biases on fraudulent behaviour: the Leeson caseAsokan Anandarajan and Gary Kleinman International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 2011, vol. 2, issue 1, 40-55 Abstract: The forensic accounting literature (e.g., Albrecht et al., 2010) places a great deal of importance on the so-called fraud triangle of motive-means-opportunity. Wolfe and Hermanson (2004) presents a cognitive analysis of factors that may impact the motivation element in the fraud triangle, arguing that situational and other factors may lead individuals to engage in illegal acts without conscious intent to violate the law. We argue that cognitive analyses are important also in understanding individual evaluations of the means and opportunities that confront them. We draw on relevant psychological literature to show how cognitive heuristics can be used to explain why certain managers, in the presence of incentives, rationalise and commit fraud in accounting. We use the 'fraud diamond' (Wolfe and Hermanson, 2004) as the basis of our theoretical development. We use the Leeson/Barings bank's case as an example to demonstrate the application of cognitive biases in the perpetration of fraud. Keywords: fraud triangle; management fraud; cognitive heuristics; cognitive bias; fraudulent behaviour; Nick Leeson; forensic accounting; psychology; incentives; Barings Bank. (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijbeaf:v:2:y:2011:i:1:p:40-55 Access Statistics for this article More articles in International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.