EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Overconfidence and stock returns: a behavioural perspective

Dimitrios Kourtidis, Željko Šević and Prodromos Chatzoglou

International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance, 2015, vol. 5, issue 1, 57-81

Abstract: This study attempts to group investors (individuals and professionals) into different segments based on their level of overconfidence (as a psychological bias) and, then, to examine whether, and to what extent, specific personality trait drive investors' trading behaviour. This study performing a cluster analysis, and using a representative survey of 345 investors in Greece, identified two main segments of investors: Overconfident investors and Underconfident investors. A comparative analysis between these two segments identified some differences in the trading behaviour of investors, depending on the segment they belong to. Moreover, a statistical association between investors' clusters and various demographic, socioeconomic characteristics and trading behaviour is also found.

Keywords: overconfidence; trading behaviour; psychological bias; behavioural finance; stock returns; investor segmentation; personality traits; cluster analysis; Greece; underconfidence; demographics; socioeconomics. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=71046 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijbeaf:v:5:y:2015:i:1:p:57-81

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Behavioural Accounting and Finance from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbeaf:v:5:y:2015:i:1:p:57-81