Settling debts in the supply chain: do prompt payment codes make a difference? A UK study

Christopher J. Cowton and Leire San-Jose ()

International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 2021, vol. 15, issue 2, 153-168

Abstract: Trade credit has only recently been taken seriously by business ethicists, despite the common practice of slow payment of suppliers. In response, the UK has introduced a series of voluntary 'payment codes'. However, at the time to which our data relate, relatively few FTSE 100 companies had signed up. Furthermore, although signatories paid more quickly, the difference was not statistically significant. These two findings might appear to suggest that payment codes are ineffective. However, some companies claimed to be following a code which was defunct. Their payment speed was indistinguishable from non-signatories, but those that had signed the extant code paid significantly more quickly. Our findings not only suggest that a payment code might be effective but also show a result relevant to codes of ethics more generally - that there might be signs that a company is not taking a code seriously, which we identify with the notion of hypocrisy.

Keywords: codes of ethics; late payment; payment codes; prompt payment; supply chains; trade credit; trade creditors. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=113945 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijbget:v:15:y:2021:i:2:p:153-168

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().