Accountability for health sector performance: what does the New Zealand public want?
Karen A. Van Peursem, Michael J. Pratt
International Journal of Business Performance Management, 2000, vol. 2, issue 1/2/3, 30-41
Abstract:
A method and rationale for selecting accountability-based report disclosures is applied in this Delphi analysis of 33 New Zealand public representatives who convey their preferences for the content of a public sector hospital report. The findings reveal interest in audited, comparative information which conveys, in particular, indicators of services provided and resource use, and a lack of consensus on whether to reveal profit or process indicators. Accountability implications of the method used and findings are discussed.
Keywords: health report; accountability; performance measures; preferences; New Zealand. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=77 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:2:y:2000:i:1/2/3:p:30-41
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in International Journal of Business Performance Management from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().