Performance measurement: the comparison between a process and a model approach

Umit Bititci, Trevor Turner, Mike Bourne

International Journal of Business Performance Management, 2001, vol. 3, issue 2/3/4, 135-153

Abstract: This paper discusses and disseminates the results of a comparative study conducted by the researchers at Cambridge and Strathclyde, in order to develop a better understanding of the relative merits of their frameworks for performance measurement. The study focuses on a small manufacturing company, which used the process designed by the Cambridge group to design and implement a performance measurement system. The Reference Model developed by the Strathclyde group was then used to audit the company's performance measurement system. The paper concludes that the two approaches are complementary if a business process view of performance measurement is taken.

Keywords: performance measurement; audit; management process. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=95 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijbpma:v:3:y:2001:i:2/3/4:p:135-153

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Business Performance Management from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().