EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A comparison of work culture between some European countries and Turkey

Semin Paksoy, Tolga Genç and Süleyman Bilgin Kılıç

International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 2015, vol. 9, issue 2, 105-122

Abstract: Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods can be applied to social areas as well as economical and industrial areas. By using MCDM, we will obtain some social outcomes from this field. In this study, we analyse and compare some countries and Turkey in terms of specific aspects of the work culture and ethics by using the PROMETHEE method, a MCDM. The objective of the European Union (EU) is to achieve economic, politic and social integration. In this respect, work culture is an important dimension of social harmonisation and integration. Results of the study show that there are no homogenisation and harmonisation among Turkey and some of the countries considered. Turkey is distinguished from the other European countries in terms of gender and immigrant discrimination in the working life.

Keywords: multicriteria decision making; MCDM; PROMETHEE; work culture; Turkey; European Union; EU; ethics; social harmonisation; integration; gender; immigrant discrimination. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=69438 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:9:y:2015:i:2:p:105-122

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Business and Systems Research from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ids:ijbsre:v:9:y:2015:i:2:p:105-122