The case for resilience: a comparative analysis

John Harrald

International Journal of Critical Infrastructures, 2012, vol. 8, issue 1, 3-21

Abstract: The utility of the concept of resiliency as a paradigm for managing society's ability to resist, absorb, and recover from extreme events is dependent upon the ability to evaluate a community's resilience and to assess the potential impacts of intentional and unintentional interventions. A framework for developing and using resilience metrics is presented. The critical components of resilience for three diverse Atlantic coastal communities subject to potential catastrophic coastal flooding are developed, described, and compared using this framework. The analysis demonstrates that, although the three areas face a common threat, they should adopt different resilience enhancing strategies that are determined by local structural, economic, and social conditions.

Keywords: resilience; natural hazards; coastal flooding; extreme events; intervention impacts; community resiliency. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=46550 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijcist:v:8:y:2012:i:1:p:3-21

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Critical Infrastructures from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().