EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A comparison of alternative parametric efficiency estimates using rank-sum test statistic

Roxani Karagiannis and Kostas Velentzas

International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics, 2009, vol. 1, issue 2, 195-209

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to compare the empirical results from three alternative parametric efficiency models using rank-sum test statistic. The comparison involves the technical efficiency scores and their hospitals ranking of the following models: a) Battese and Coelli (1992); b) technical inefficiency effect model (Battese and Coelli, 1995); c) non-neutral frontier model (Huang and Liu, 1994). For all models an output – distance production function are estimated using panel data of 112 Greek public hospitals. Technical efficiency scores found to be from 37.10% to 58.10%. Battese and Coelli (1992) model represented higher proportion of hospitals with technical efficiency scores between 50%-70%. Rank-sum test statistic implied that the three stochastic models came from different distribution.

Keywords: technical efficiency; stochastic frontier analysis; rank statistics; hospitals; Greece; parametric efficiency; stochastic modelling; rank-sum test; Greece; healthcare. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=29258 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijcome:v:1:y:2009:i:2:p:195-209

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Computational Economics and Econometrics from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcome:v:1:y:2009:i:2:p:195-209