The role of accounting in the death penalty debate

Robert Peace and Thomas Reiland

International Journal of Critical Accounting, 2010, vol. 2, issue 1, 79-95

Abstract: Accounting plays a role in the death penalty debate. Accounting studies have compared the cost of capital punishment with the cost of life imprisonment. The studies have all shown that it is cheaper to lock convicted murderers up than it is to employ capital punishment. A survey was conducted for this paper to determine the attitudes of senior level and graduate accounting majors regarding capital punishment. Participants were asked, yes or no, whether they favoured capital punishment. Then they were given information about the accounting studies that point to the greater costs associated with the death penalty. The purpose was to determine if accounting applications and dollar cost, factors in classical, rational and economic choice structure, had an influence on those with an academic investment in the accounting profession. The data collected show that accounting students were statistically consistent with the population in general in favour of the death penalty.

Keywords: death penalty; public policy debate; accounting studies; social costs; capital punishment; life imprisonment; USA; United States. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=30339 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:2:y:2010:i:1:p:79-95

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Critical Accounting from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().