Academic freedom and a critique of 'top quality' accounting research

Bruce Committe

International Journal of Critical Accounting, 2017, vol. 9, issue 1, 42-52

Abstract: The retraction of articles, suspected to be fraudulent in their nature, in so-called 'top quality' accounting research journals is a reason the quality of accounting research should not be judged, and never should have been judged, by the mere reputation of the journal in which the published article appears. Instead, accounting research articles should be judged, and always should have been judged, by the content of the article published regardless of where it is published. Judging the quality of research by mere reference to the journal in which it is published is irrational. And, more importantly, making faculty personnel decisions based, at least in part, on the judged 'quality' of someone's research, much less on the mere 'quality' of the journal in which it is published, is a denial of the academic freedom to which all faculty are entitled in their research and teaching.

Keywords: James Hunton; Robert Libby; academic freedom; academic fraud; accounting research; research fraud; accounting fraud; top quality. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=83636 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:9:y:2017:i:1:p:42-52

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Critical Accounting from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().