EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Empirical evidence on the validity of using accounting research subjects' self-reported GPA as a proxy measure of actual GPA

Robert Marley and Steve Platau

International Journal of Critical Accounting, 2017, vol. 9, issue 3, 193-205

Abstract: This study investigates the association between accounting subjects' self-reported GPA and their actual GPA. Using accounting seniors as a proxy for accounting research subjects, we administered a survey instrument to obtain self-reported GPAs and then compared subjects' self-reported values to official GPA records. Finding a strong correlation, this study provides empirical evidence suggesting that accounting subjects' self-reported GPA is a valid proxy for accounting subjects' actual GPA. We also find evidence that some accounting subjects systematically misreport their GPA predictable ways. This study should be of interest to accounting behaviourists, who frequently rely on accounting subjects' self-reported GPA in place of obtaining accounting subjects' actual GPA. The practical implications of this study's results are discussed.

Keywords: behavioural accounting research; classical test theory; grade point average; GPA; measurement validity; proxy measures; self-reported GPA. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=88716 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:193-205

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Critical Accounting from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ids:ijcrac:v:9:y:2017:i:3:p:193-205