International Journal of Economics and Accounting's introducing the classics: Abraham Briloff's 'The gap in GAAP'

Aida Sy and Tony Tinker

International Journal of Economics and Accounting, 2010, vol. 1, issue 3, 181-183

Abstract: The accounting classics series in the International Journal of Economics and Accounting is an important strand in this journal's policy of bringing a critical understanding of auditing and financial reporting. This journal is only interested in the technocratic regression and market studies research, if authors display a degree of critical self-reflection. The tacit ideological thrust of mainstream market studies research is an affirmation of the market and its capacity to deliver economic and social equilibrium results. Market studies publications rarely wear this ideology openly on its sleeve; rather their delivery is slick – sticking to 'the facts' allowing the data to 'speak for itself'. The applause for the market is implicit and its efficacy is taken as 'self-evident' – that's the successful advanced economies work. Of course, that's all changed; we are in deep trouble, and urgently need to revisit Briloff and the lessons he brings us (Cooper, 2008).

Keywords: debits; credits; archivalism; empiricism; Briloff; GAAP; financial reporting; auditing history. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=36801 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:1:y:2010:i:3:p:181-183

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Economics and Accounting from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().