Contra contractarianism

Gabriel Donleavy ()

International Journal of Economics and Accounting, 2010, vol. 1, issue 3, 223-231

Abstract: Classical ethics are universal in their claims to bind people, but the field of business ethics has been especially vulnerable to ethical relativism. Within the field of jurisprudence there has been an attempt to decouple law from ethics by arguing law has an inner morality divorceable from its substantive provisions. Van Oosterhout et al. (2006) import this approach into the field of business relations in general and business contracts in particular. They claim integrated social contract theory is the best ethical paradigm for business, because it admits as ethics only what contracting parties have agreed to and a tiny number of additional norms that are generally accepted in the applicable business community. This attempt to privatise ethics is critically deconstructed in the present paper, by way of challenging a potentially virulent strain of ethical relativism.

Keywords: contract theory; business ethics; hyper norms; integrative social contracts theory; ISCT; language games. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=36804 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijecac:v:1:y:2010:i:3:p:223-231

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Economics and Accounting from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().