Fixed price contract versus incentive-based contract in the oil and gas industry
Knut Arne Sund and
Kjell Hausken
International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 2012, vol. 35, issue 5, 371-410
Abstract:
The research question of this paper is to analyse when an operator and a service provider prefer a fixed price contract, common in the oil and gas industry, versus the uncommon incentive-based contract. The contracts are modelled with 20 parameters and one free choice variable which is the time to complete the project determined by the service provider. The method is to determine the service provider's first order condition and compare the two actors' profits for the two contracts. The actors' preferences for the two contracts are presented with analytical inequalities and graphic illustrations. We show when both actors, versus only one actor, prefer(s) the incentive-based contract. Both actors never jointly prefer the fixed price contract. The two actors collectively always prefer the incentive-based contract. This result follows since costs associated with moral hazard, adverse selection, monitoring, coordination, etc. decrease with the use of an incentive-based contract.
Keywords: incentive based contracts; fixed price contracts; moral hazard; adverse selection; profit; cost; oil and gas industry. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=46727 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijgeni:v:35:y:2012:i:5:p:371-410
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in International Journal of Global Energy Issues from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().