EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Numerical analysis of wind flow patterns over complex hilly terrains: comparison between two commonly used CFD software

A.Z. Dhunny, M.R. Lollchund and S.D.D.V. Rughooputh

International Journal of Global Energy Issues, 2016, vol. 39, issue 3/4, 181-203

Abstract: Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has become a very useful tool to study the wind flow patterns over complex terrains. The present work evaluates the performance of some well-known CFD software for this endeavour. The CFD software considered are OpenFOAM and WindSim, each solving numerically the Reynolds Average Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations in the turbulent regime using the standard k-ε model. Different terrain complexity ranging from smooth terrain to more complex ones are considered: the Askervein and Bolund hills. Simulated results were verified and compared against actual measurements. The study concludes that, for more complex rough terrains, WindSim gives more accurate results as compared to OpenFOAM.

Keywords: wind flow analysis; complex hilly terrains; computational fluid dynamics; CFD; OpenFOAM; WindSim; wind flow patterns; simulation; rough terrain. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=76339 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijgeni:v:39:y:2016:i:3/4:p:181-203

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Global Energy Issues from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ids:ijgeni:v:39:y:2016:i:3/4:p:181-203