Perspectives on precaution: the role of policymakers in dealing with the uncertainties of agricultural biotechnology
Dane Scott
International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 2005, vol. 5, issue 1/2, 10-35
Abstract:
From 1999 to 2004, the European Union had in place a moratorium on new genetically modified (GM) products. This moratorium created a tense trade dispute between the United States and the EU. While the moratorium has now been lifted, differences remain between the EU's and US's approach to GM products. The essence of the conflict involves differing approaches to the rate of technological transfer. The US advocates a rapid rate of technological transfer, while the EU advocates a slow and cautious rate. The EU's "proceed slowly" approach is grounded in the controversial precautionary principle (PP). Crudely, the PP places the burden of proof on the developers of new technologies like GM to show that their products do not pose a threat to human health or the environment. While the PP has grown in influence in Europe over the last three decades policymakers in the US have largely rejected it. The following enquiry will examine the justifications for these conflicting perspectives on precaution toward technological transfer of GM, or transgenic research. The ultimate goal is to shed light on the role of policymakers in dealing with the uncertainties associated with this new and powerful technology.
Keywords: ethics; EU/US trade dispute; genetically modified organisms; policy making; uncertainty; agricultural biotechnology; GM products; European Union; United States; USA; technological transfer rate; precautionary principle; health risk; environmental risk; transgenic research; precaution. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=6260 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijgenv:v:5:y:2005:i:1/2:p:10-35
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in International Journal of Global Environmental Issues from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().