Characterising the choice environment: feeling constrained as an impediment to happiness

Katherine Guthrie and Jan Sokolowsky

International Journal of Happiness and Development, 2013, vol. 1, issue 3, 261-273

Abstract: We posit that happiness reflects not only utility from realised choices, but also discontentment from having to forego alternatives. Under this view, utility and happiness maximisation yield the same optimal choices in a variety of standard economic decision problems, but utility and happiness can move in opposite directions when the choice set changes. Our theory: 1) respects economists' and psychologists' notions of utility and happiness; 2) captures why the two concepts are often confused; 3) explains the Easterlin Paradox without resorting to systematically poor choices; 4) offers a novel interpretation of previous empirical findings in which individuals' choices go hand-in-hand with lower happiness.

Keywords: behavioural choice; constraints; contentment; decision theory; discontentment; Easterlin Paradox; happiness; rational choice; satisfaction; shadow value; utility; welfare; well-being. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=57670 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijhdev:v:1:y:2013:i:3:p:261-273

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Happiness and Development from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().