EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Measuring the impact of communities of practice: a conceptual model

Donald C. Ropes

International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital, 2011, vol. 8, issue 1, 94-107

Abstract: Communities of practice (CoPs) impact different actors in different ways. Because using a singular approach would not do justice to the complexity that surrounds CoPs, a multi-disciplinary and pluralistic approach is used here to develop a model for measuring the impact CoPs may have on individuals, groups and the organisations in which they are situated. A review of the literature showed no such comprehensive model. In fact, empirical work on CoPs, in general, is scarce and evaluations of them are underdeveloped. Most assessments are look at process alone, or try to link output to anecdotal evidence. I try to fill this gap by presenting a multi-disciplinary conceptual model that approaches measuring certain types of impact a CoP has on individuals and groups that are functioning as CoPs. I also make a theoretical link to how CoPs may contribute to organisational capability.

Keywords: communities of practice; CoPs; impact measurement; organisational learning; group learning; organisational impact; organisational capability. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=37361 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p:94-107

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Learning and Intellectual Capital from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ids:ijlica:v:8:y:2011:i:1:p:94-107