Criteria selection framework for sustainable development indicators

Hippu Salk Kristle Nathan and Sudhakara Reddy

International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making, 2011, vol. 1, issue 3, 257-279

Abstract: The selection of an optimum number of indicators is the key to any sustainable development indicator (SDI) research. Indicators, too less in number, may be inadequate to convey the message and; too many may dilute the purpose. To arrive at an optimum number of indicators from a larger set of potential ones, a set of criteria is applied. In the past SDI-initiatives, emphasis was not laid on structuring criteria; these were invariably considered in a linear way. This paper proposes a framework to organise criteria in a tree fashion at successive levels. For each level, the weights of a criterion relative to others are determined by following analytical hierarchy process where experts' opinions are considered. For aggregation of scores, 'displaced ideal' method is proposed over linear additive model.

Keywords: what-how-whom framework; value trees; analytical hierarchy process; AHP; displaced ideal; criteria selection; sustainable development indicators; sustainability indicators. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=41189 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijmcdm:v:1:y:2011:i:3:p:257-279

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Multicriteria Decision Making from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().