EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Definitional imprecisions in strategic and non-strategic Corporate Social Responsibility

Glen Kurokawa and Darryl R.J. Macer

International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 2008, vol. 3, issue 2, 121-133

Abstract: A fundamental tension between strategic and non-strategic Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) exists. The former is about CSR for profit-maximisation while the latter is independent of profit. Given, the intensity of discourse and dialogue underway regarding CSR the distinction between these two classes of CSR needs to be more precisely defined. Well-founded consensus is harder to build, whether in academia, the business world or the rest of society, the less informed are the decisions made regarding CSR. This article argues that the debate between strategic and non-strategic CSR suffers from significant definitional problems that plague discussion and debate involving CSR which involve the terms 'social benefit' and 'profit'. These are addressed through a perspective that incorporates these definitional uncertainties. The latter leads to several prescriptions: increased awareness of imprecision, more case-study approaches for CSR and increased empirical understanding of definitional imprecisions.

Keywords: business ethics; business social responsibility; BSR; corporate ethics; strategic CSR; corporate social responsibility; definition; social benefit; profit; imprecision; uncertainty. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=21270 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:3:y:2008:i:2:p:121-133

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmcph:v:3:y:2008:i:2:p:121-133