The impact of self-monitoring on the negotiation of emotionally laden and non–emotionally laden issues

Michael Boland and William H. Ross

International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 2007, vol. 4, issue 6, 674-692

Abstract: A 2 × 2 × 2 bargaining experiment used Snyder and Gangestad's self-monitoring scale to match negotiators (high versus low) and their opponents (high versus low). The nature of the issues (emotionally laden versus non–emotionally laden) was a third factor. When both negotiators were high in self-monitoring, higher joint outcomes were obtained. Distributive Justice beliefs and satisfaction with outcomes generally followed the pattern of outcomes. Two covariates were used. Machiavellianism was negatively related to the dependent variables. Emotional Intelligence, as measured by the MSCEIT test, was unrelated to the dependent variables. Implications of the findings for the selection of negotiators were discussed.

Keywords: negotiation; bargaining; self-monitoring; motional intelligence; Machiavellianism; distributive justice; emotionally laden; non–emotionally laden; negotiators; negotiator selection. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=14988 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijmede:v:4:y:2007:i:6:p:674-692

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().