Economics at your fingertips  

How strong is the case for the fiscal exceptionalism of the telecommunications sector?

Martin Cave

International Journal of Management and Network Economics, 2012, vol. 2, issue 4, 322-335

Abstract: Telecommunications are subject to exceptional fiscal treatment in respect of both taxes and subsidies. Services are subject to special taxes in many jurisdictions; and special subsidies are paid to finance investments, especially in new fibre networks. The paper analyses the validity in general of both of these forms of treatment. In many jurisdictions the ground for collecting special taxes seems to hinge, especially in developing countries, upon the relatively low costs of tax collection. However, special taxes may discourage diffusion and restrict growth. In relation to subsidies, the justification can run from equity or industrial policy goals to the avoidance of market failure. In both instances, the argument depends on the degree to which investment in telecommunications creates externalities which enhance growth. The paper concludes that no general case for either form of special treatment has been proven.

Keywords: telecommunications industry; taxes; subsidies; effects on growth; exceptional fiscal treatment; taxation; new fibre networks; investment finance; developing countries; tax collection costs; telecommunications investment; special treatment. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Management and Network Economics from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().

Page updated 2022-09-30
Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmnec:v:2:y:2012:i:4:p:322-335