A quandary in management practice: academic research or consulting?

Andrew Creed and Ambika Zutshi

International Journal of Management Practice, 2014, vol. 7, issue 1, 39-54

Abstract: This paper compares the practice of academic action research against management consulting. Consulting is founded upon a body of underpinning knowledge drawn from a different perspective than action research. Nevertheless, consulting and action research, in practice, draw from similar methods of investigation. The difficulty in distinguishing action research from consulting adds to unique ethical problems in practice. In this paper, an ethics quandary is identified, defined and explored with implications for research practice. An example of an action research project is presented to highlight the potential ethical dilemma and conflict of interest points of the investigation, whether as an academic or a consultant. The authors, by crystallising the boundaries of academic action research and consulting posit that, when designed and executed well, risk can be minimised to gather rich and deep insights into management practice.

Keywords: management consulting; action research; academic research; qualitative; quantitative; ethics; ethical quandary; phenomenology; ethnography; academics; consultants; risk; management practice. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=60542 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:7:y:2014:i:1:p:39-54

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Management Practice from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().