 The perceived size of packages of complex vs. simple shape depends upon the number of packages presentedLawrence L. Garber Jr., Eva M. Hyatt and Ünal Ö. Boya International Journal of Management Practice, 2014, vol. 7, issue 2, 144-159 Abstract: A research gap exists regarding the respective effects of package shape and presentation context on size perception. Some prior research shows that complex packages appear larger than simple packages of equal volume. Other research shows the opposite. We resolve the dilemma by showing that shape and presentation context interact to create size impressions. Subjects estimated the relative volumes of sets of packages whose shapes are simple or complex, presented in package sets whose numbers range from two to 16. When packages are displayed in sets of nine or more, packages of simple shape appear larger than packages of complex shape. When packages are presented in sets of eight or less, complex packages appear larger than simple packages. This reversal suggests that the volume estimation strategies employed by consumers change when the complexity of the visual tableau before them leads to cognitive overload. Keywords: packaging; package shape; presentation context; shelf clutter; size estimation; size estimation heuristics; size estimation error; volume estimation; perceived size; package size; complex shapes; simple shapes; size perception; cognitive overload. (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijmpra:v:7:y:2014:i:2:p:144-159 Access Statistics for this article More articles in International Journal of Management Practice from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.