Transactions, power and contested exchange: towards a theory of exchange in business relationships

Andrew Cox

International Journal of Procurement Management, 2007, vol. 1, issue 1/2, 38-59

Abstract: Notwithstanding Williamson's view that current definitions of power are overreliant on resource-dependency arguments and tautological, it is argued that it is possible to develop a theoretically robust and empirically rigorous reconceptualisation of power in business transactions. This requires an understanding of the commensurability of the objective interests of transaction partners, and a more detailed specification of the structural and cognitive power resources available to shape contractual outcomes asymmetrically, in horizontal and vertical business relationships. It is argued that exchange can be both contested and uncontested, but power is only relevant when exchange is contested. When power is exerted it is possible to conceptualise three dimensions of power and leverage in business and economic transactions, and this provides the starting point for a theory of exchange in business relationships.

Keywords: business relationships; contested exchange; buyer-supplier power; transaction cost economics; business transactions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=15354 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:1:y:2007:i:1/2:p:38-59

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Procurement Management from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().