Practical common weights compromise solution approach for technology selection

R. Kiani Mavi, A. Makui, S. Fazli and A. Alinezhad

International Journal of Procurement Management, 2010, vol. 3, issue 2, 214-230

Abstract: Industrial managers are often faced with the dilemma of selecting a single most appropriate technology from a range of competing options. The rapid development of technologies, together with their increasing complexity and variety, has made the task of technology selection difficult. Technology selection and justification involve decision-makings that are critical to the profitability and growth of a company in the increasing competitive global scenario. In many cases, the selection processes are based on generic decision support tools which are not fully adapted for technology selection. In this paper, a practical common weight compromise solution methodology with an improved discriminating power is introduced for selecting the best technology. Robustness and discriminating power of this method in robot evaluation problem is justified. High Spearman's rank correlation between the ranks obtained by this approach and previous approaches justifies the robustness of the approach.

Keywords: technology selection; MCDM; multi-criteria decision making; compromise solution; weight restriction; common performance attribute weights; appropriate technologies; technology justification; robot evaluation; robot selection. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=30736 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:3:y:2010:i:2:p:214-230

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Procurement Management from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().