The impact of agreed principles in the culture of alliance contracts
Anthony J. Mills,
Andrew Devery and
Alexia Nalewaik
International Journal of Procurement Management, 2016, vol. 9, issue 6, 718-732
Abstract:
Adversarial forms of procurement have for some time marred the Australian construction industry. Alliance contracting is a relational type of procurement underpinned by a 'no litigation' and 'best for project decision-making' approach. The research used a semi-structured interview mechanism to examine the contract language and the objectives of the charter in guiding the behaviour of members of the alliance. The purpose was to highlight the role of such contract terms in the success of the alliance. This paper found that the principles and objectives played a role in the contract by reducing litigation, and clearly defining the non-owner participant's relationship within the alliance team. Despite individual members of the alliance facing uncertainty and risk in the project, the principles and objectives within the contract were significant to the success of the alliance.
Keywords: alliance contracts; construction industry; success factors; alliance principles; Australia; contract language; contract terms; uncertainty; project risk; procurement; alliance contracting. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=79982 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijpman:v:9:y:2016:i:6:p:718-732
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in International Journal of Procurement Management from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().