EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The relevance of project management software's features in the United Arab Emirates

Ilija Stojanović, Adis Puška and Nasiha Osmanovic

International Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 2021, vol. 13, issue 4, 361-378

Abstract: Project management is unthinkable nowadays without the use of appropriate software. We compared different features of Asana, Basecamp, Microsoft Project, Smartsheet and Oracle Primavera software to investigate which of these solutions has the best characteristics in the opinion of the project managers in the UAE. In this study, a multicriteria analysis was used to evaluate selected software solutions. Entropy and multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC) methods were used. The entropy method was used to determine the weights of the criteria, while the MABAC method was used to determine the software ranking. Data for the purposes of this study were collected from the five top-ranked project management software by the g2.com user community. The results obtained showed that Asana software was rated the best, while Oracle Primavera was rated the worst from selected software solutions. These results were confirmed by the performed sensitivity analysis.

Keywords: project management software; software features comparison; Asana; Basecamp; Microsoft Project; Smartsheet; Oracle Primavera; UAE. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=119508 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:361-378

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Project Organisation and Management from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-23
Handle: RePEc:ids:ijpoma:v:13:y:2021:i:4:p:361-378