Assessing the prediction of employee productivity: a comparison of OLS vs. CART

Ina S. Markham

International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 2011, vol. 8, issue 3, 313-332

Abstract: This research compares the results of utilising an ordinary least squares (OLS) approach vs. a classification and regression tree (CART) approach for identifying employees with a high likelihood of being productive. Relevant performance data were collected from 378 employees of a large garment manufacturer. Past research (Markham et al., 2006) has shown that a combined genetic algorithm with an artificial neural network substantially outperformed (R² = 0.30) an equivalent OLS solution (R² = 0.14) when predicting individual level productivity. The current research compares the use of CART to OLS using the same data set. With an R² of 0.43, the CART results were even more powerful in identifying and classifying high performance employees. The implications of this finding for the field of productivity research and employee selection are discussed.

Keywords: employee productivity; CART; classification; regression trees; employee selection; biodata; piece rate; job performance; ordinary least squares; OLS; garment manufacturing; clothing indutry; garment industry; apparel industry. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=42511 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijpqma:v:8:y:2011:i:3:p:313-332

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().