 Is public health expenditure in Ecuador progressive or regressive?Gustavo Angeles, Antonio J. Trujillo and Alexandra Lastra International Journal of Public Policy, 2007, vol. 2, issue 3/4, 186-216 Abstract: This paper uses a benefit incidence analysis (BIA) to evaluate whether public health expenditure in Ecuador is regressive or progressive. This paper overcomes several limitations of previous BIA analyses in developing countries: a) it develops a framework to allocate the operational and administrative government expenditures among providers at a centralised level according to their level of activity; b) it uses a household health survey in which an individual's consumption of medical care can be tied to a specific health provider. We rank the economic status of medical care users according to the consumption per adult equivalent, and using an index obtained from the availability of durable goods in the household. The findings suggest that the Ministry of Public Health expenditure is progressive, while the Ecuadorian Social Security Institute expenditure is regressive. We offer policy suggestions to increase the efficiency and equity of public health expenditures in Ecuador. Keywords: benefit incidence analysis; BIA; Ecuador; health expenditures; health disparities; public health; medical care users; socio-economic status; government subsidies; developing countries; healthcare; public policy. (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:2:y:2007:i:3/4:p:186-216 Access Statistics for this article More articles in International Journal of Public Policy from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.