EU cohesion policy: the debate on Structural Funds

John Bradley ()

International Journal of Public Policy, 2008, vol. 3, issue 3/4, 246-260

Abstract: After 15 years of EU cohesion policy, implemented through National Development Plans (NDPs) and Structural Funds (SFs), economists remain divided on interpretations of policy effectiveness. As new member states prepare for the next programme of EU cohesion aid, it is important to review this debate. Two contrasting empirical approaches are distinguished: 'testing' and 'impact quantification'. We examine views of participants in the debate, and the methodologies and tools of economic analysis that are commonly used to support different conclusions. Having surveyed current methodologies, we conclude that none of them are likely to provide a decisive resolution to the debate.

Keywords: EU cohesion policy; lagging EU states; catch-up; convergence; structural funds; national development plans; NDPs; policy analysis; macro models; European Union; European integration. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=19069 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijpubp:v:3:y:2008:i:3/4:p:246-260

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Public Policy from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().