Contrasting values in the sustainability debate: limitations of economic valuations and their role in decision-making
Andrew L. Fanning
International Journal of Sustainable Development, 2016, vol. 19, issue 2, 185-200
This paper explores some of the more controversial conceptual issues surrounding ecosystem valuations in monetary terms along with their role in the greater decision-making process. I argue that there is an urgent need to be explicit about the underlying ideologies and social goals being pursued by any given policy/action. The degree to which a given policy makes trade-offs between achieving each goal should also be transparent. In the context of the sustainability debate, economic valuations of ecosystems can provide missing information necessary for achieving the goal of consumptive efficiency, but they must be accompanied by a similar 'conversion' of how much economic activity contributes to the goal of ecological sustainability.
Keywords: values; sustainability debate; economic valuation; utilitarianism; decision making; ecosystem services; monetary valuation; ideologies; social goals; consumptive efficiency; ecological sustainability; just distribution; sustainable development. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijsusd:v:19:y:2016:i:2:p:185-200
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in International Journal of Sustainable Development from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().