Seasonal adjustment with 'bad' neural networks: a case of benign underfitting

Bruce Curry and Peter H. Morgan

International Journal of Applied Management Science, 2010, vol. 2, issue 4, 335-350

Abstract: This paper is a response to reports by a number of authors of difficulties in using feedforward neural networks (NNs) in the presence of seasonality. Such difficulties appear to contradict the well-known property of 'universal approximation', but arise in fact because the property only applies to suitably smooth functions. We report on what is an unexpected benefit of this limitation of NNs: although the network is unable to follow seasonal movements it can identify an underlying trend, through being forced to steer a middle course. We achieve such deseasonalisation through network pruning, which restricts the approximation capacity of the network by depriving it of connections. Although pruning is in general motivated by the search for the most parsimonious network, in our particular context it forces the network to ignore both seasonal movements and noise.

Keywords: neural networks; seasonality; optimisation; differential evolution; penalty function; network pruning. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=36590 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:injams:v:2:y:2010:i:4:p:335-350

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Applied Management Science from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().