A DEA model with identical weight assignment based on multiple perspectives

Xiaopeng Yang and Hiroshi Morita

International Journal of Applied Management Science, 2012, vol. 4, issue 1, 18-35

Abstract: For a complicated banking system with various financial attributes, there are usually different classifications of inputs and outputs from the perspectives of different stakeholders. In order to obtain the highest efficiency score, different perspectives tend to select different weight assignment schemes, even in evaluating the same bank. In order to balance multiple perspectives (Pareto optimality) based on their market statuses and evaluate DMU more objectively, we propose a new DEA model incorporating Nash bargaining game (NBG) theory, which focuses on seeking an identical weight assignment scheme to cater to multiple perspectives.

Keywords: data envelopment analysis; DEA; multiple perspectives; weight assignment; Nash bargaining game; NBG; banking systems; banks; Pareto optimality; market status. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=44869 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:injams:v:4:y:2012:i:1:p:18-35

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Applied Management Science from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().