Peer group benchmarking in CEO compensation and firm innovation: evidence from patents and citations

Shahbaz Sheikh

International Journal of Accounting and Finance, 2017, vol. 7, issue 2, 163-184

Abstract: This study provides empirical evidence on the relation between peer group benchmarking in CEO compensation and firm innovation measured by number of patents and citations. Results show that peer group benchmarking and firm innovation are positively related. However, this positive relation holds only for CEOs who receive higher than median peer group compensation. For CEOs who receive lower than median peer group compensation, benchmarking seems to have no statistically significant effect on firm innovation. The study also finds that CEO compensation benchmarked against median peer group compensation is positively related to one-year and five-year stock return volatility. Overall, results suggest that benchmarking in CEO compensation is an efficient response to competitive pressures in CEO talent market and is not driven by an intentional effort by the powerful CEOs to extract rents from their firms.

Keywords: CEO compensation; compensation gap; benchmarking; peer groups; patents; citations; innovation; risk. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=85504 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:intjaf:v:7:y:2017:i:2:p:163-184

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Accounting and Finance from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().