Hospital costs and social cost: A case study of newborn hearing screening

Carmen Herrero () and Juan Moreno-Ternero

Investigaciones Economicas, 2005, vol. 29, issue 1, 203-216

Abstract: The economic evaluation of health care programs can be carried out from two different perspectives: the hospital’s narrow perspective and the social perspective, which includes all costs. It is well known that, depending on the perspective, the economic evaluation may lead to discrepant recommendations. In this paper we present an example of this situation by reporting an economic evaluation of the screening procedures to detect congenital hearing impairment in newborns. We obtain that from the hospital’s perspective a targeted procedure, based on a previous high-risk criterion, is preferred, whereas from the social perspective a universal procedure is preferred.

Keywords: Economic evaluation; health care programs; cost-effectiveness analysis; QALYs; newborn hearing screening. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D61 I12 I18 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.fundacionsepi.es/investigacion/revista ... /Ene2005/v29i1a7.pdf Full text (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iec:inveco:v:29:y:2005:i:1:p:203-216

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.fundacio ... tas/presentacion.asp

Access Statistics for this article

Investigaciones Economicas is currently edited by Antonio Cabrales and Pedro Mira

More articles in Investigaciones Economicas from Fundación SEPI Investigaciones Economicas Fundación SEPI Quintana, 2 (planta 3) 28008 Madrid Spain.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Isabel Sánchez-Seco ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).