Private Provision of Public Goods and the Failure of the Neutrality Property in Large Finite Economies

Timothy L Fries, Edward Golding and Richard Romano

International Economic Review, 1991, vol. 32, issue 1, 147-57

Abstract: The pure public goods paradigm has been criticized because it implies the implausible result that, under certain assumptions, any (small) arbitrary income redistribution will have no effect on the allocation of resources. It is shown that this particular criticism is unwarranted because, for large enough economies, the assumptions necessary for this neutrality property will hold true for a negligible small subset of the parameter space. Copyright 1991 by Economics Department of the University of Pennsylvania and the Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association.

Date: 1991
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0020-6598%2819910 ... O%3B2-G&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ier:iecrev:v:32:y:1991:i:1:p:147-57

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0020-6598

Access Statistics for this article

International Economic Review is currently edited by Harold L. Cole

More articles in International Economic Review from Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association 160 McNeil Building, 3718 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and ().