Labor Hoarding and the Business Cycle

Bruce C Horning

International Economic Review, 1994, vol. 35, issue 1, 87-100

Abstract: The puzzle of procyclical labor productivity occupies an important position in the debate over real business cycle theory. Real business cycle proponents attribute it to procyclical technology shocks, opponents to 'labor hoarding'--retention during recessions of workers not needed for current production, thus downwardly biasing productivity measurements. This paper uses a model featuring heterogeneous industries to illustrate that the conventional presumption of countercyclical aggregate labor hoarding generating procyclical productivity measurements is not necessarily well grounded in theory. Copyright 1994 by Economics Department of the University of Pennsylvania and the Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association.

Date: 1994
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Downloads: (external link)
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0020-6598%2819940 ... O%3B2-O&origin=repec full text (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to JSTOR subscribers. See http://www.jstor.org for details.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ier:iecrev:v:35:y:1994:i:1:p:87-100

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.blackwell ... bs.asp?ref=0020-6598

Access Statistics for this article

International Economic Review is currently edited by Harold L. Cole

More articles in International Economic Review from Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association 160 McNeil Building, 3718 Locust Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6297. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and ().