Why Are There So Many Different Continuous Improvement Models?: A Reflection of Practice

Brian J. Galli
Additional contact information
Brian J. Galli: Assistant Professor and Graduate Program Director, Master of Science in Engineering Management Industrial Engineering, Hofstra University, USA

International Journal of Applied Logistics (IJAL), 2019, vol. 9, issue 1, 73-91

Abstract: This article examines the implementation of continuous improvement patterns and the various continuous improvement (CI) models used in an organization. Despite the size of an organization, the goal is to achieve the maximum profit by pursuing continuous improvement. There are certain models and theories used in organizations for this reason, which include total quality management, business process re-engineering, Six Sigma, and Lean manufacturing methodology. These models are not only concerned with customer retention and profit maximization, but they are also equally effective for the employee's wellbeing. Different methodologies used in continuous improvement processes will help industrial engineers simplify complex tasks by applying CI tools to different situations. However, the key is to understand what tools and models are appropriate for each application.

Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve. ... 4018/IJAL.2019010105 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:igg:jal000:v:9:y:2019:i:1:p:73-91

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Applied Logistics (IJAL) is currently edited by Lincoln C. Wood

More articles in International Journal of Applied Logistics (IJAL) from IGI Global
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journal Editor ().