Exploring Myths in Digital Forensics: Separating Science From Ritual

Gary C. Kessler and Gregory H. Carlton
Additional contact information
Gary C. Kessler: Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach, FL, USA
Gregory H. Carlton: California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, CA, USA

International Journal of Interdisciplinary Telecommunications and Networking (IJITN), 2017, vol. 9, issue 4, 1-9

Abstract: Digital forensic methodology deviates significantly relative to the methods of other forensic sciences for numerous practical reasons, and it has been largely influenced by factors derived from the inception and evolution of this relatively new and rapidly changing field. Digital forensics methodology was developed more by practitioners in its early days rather than by computer scientists. This led to accepted best practices in the field that may not represent the best or, at least, tested, science. This paper explores some of these differences in the practice and evolution between digital and other forensic sciences, and recommends scientific approaches to apply to many digital forensic practice rituals.

Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve. ... 018/IJITN.2017100101 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:igg:jitn00:v:9:y:2017:i:4:p:1-9

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Interdisciplinary Telecommunications and Networking (IJITN) is currently edited by Efosa Carroll Idemudia

More articles in International Journal of Interdisciplinary Telecommunications and Networking (IJITN) from IGI Global
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journal Editor ().