User Evaluation of Mobile Devices: In-Situ versus Laboratory Experiments

Francis Jambon
Additional contact information
Francis Jambon: Grenoble Universities, France

International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI), 2009, vol. 1, issue 2, 56-71

Abstract: Nowadays, mobile devices features are often linked up to the context of usage. As a consequence, researchers must consider not only the user and the device, but also the surrounding environment when designing effective user study evaluations. Two opposite experimental setups are possible: in-situ and in the laboratory. There is no consensus on their respective benefits, for instance with regard to the number of usability issues detected. In this paper, we isolate independent variables that could contribute to evaluation biases by proposing a taxonomy that splits the in-situ experimental setups into two new setups. We describe the concept of the “Uncertainty Principle” to emphasize the dilemma between precise observation and bias minimization and introduce the “Trojan Horse” technique to partially overcome the consequences of the uncertainty principle. As a conclusion, a methodology using both laboratory and in-situ experiments in a complementary way is proposed.

Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve. ... 018/jmhci.2009040104 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:igg:jmhci0:v:1:y:2009:i:2:p:56-71

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI) is currently edited by Joanna Lumsden

More articles in International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction (IJMHCI) from IGI Global
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journal Editor ().