The Ethics of Astrobiology and the Cosmic Bet Argument

Luca Lo Sapio
Additional contact information
Luca Lo Sapio: University of Turin, Italy

International Journal of Technoethics (IJT), 2024, vol. 15, issue 1, 1-8

Abstract: Stephen Weinberg posited in 1977 that as the universe becomes more comprehensible, it appears more meaningless owing to a strict division between facts and values. He seemingly overlooked the consideration of the purposes and values of intelligent life in examining its ability to influence the universe's development. The scientific revolution, initiated by Copernicus's heliocentric hypothesis and furthered by Darwin's theory, shifted humanity's perceived place in the cosmos, removing the sacred. However, developments in astrobiology and discoveries related to the Fermi Paradox and the Rare Earth Hypothesis are hinting at humanity's significant role in the universe, suggesting we might be the only intelligent species. This paper argues that advancing scientific knowledge reinforces the hypothesis of human exclusivity and importance in the cosmos, making the potential sixth mass extinction cosmically significant and underscoring the imperative of human persistence in the cosmos.

Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJT.349735 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:igg:jt0000:v:15:y:2024:i:1:p:1-8

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Technoethics (IJT) is currently edited by Steven Umbrello

More articles in International Journal of Technoethics (IJT) from IGI Global
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journal Editor ().