Drone Warfare: Ethical and Psychological Issues

Robert Paul Churchill
Additional contact information
Robert Paul Churchill: Department of Philosophy, George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA

International Journal of Technoethics (IJT), 2015, vol. 6, issue 2, 31-46

Abstract: The United States is now relying on Reaper and Predator drone strikes as its primary strategy in the continuing War on Terrorism. This paper argues for the rational scrutiny drone warfare has yet to receive. It is argued that drone warfare is immoral as it fails both the jus in bello and the jus ad bellum conditions of Just War theory. Drone warfare cannot be accepted on utilitarian grounds either, as it is very probable that terrorists will acquire drones capable of lethal strikes and deploy them against defenseless civilians. Moreover, by examining the psychological bases for reliance on drone warfare, as well as the message the United States is sending adversaries, we need to be concerned that, rather than reduce the likelihood of terrorists strikes, the U.S. reliance on drones strikes threatens to institutionalize terrorism as the status quo for the foreseeable future.

Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve. ... .4018/IJT.2015070103 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:igg:jt0000:v:6:y:2015:i:2:p:31-46

Access Statistics for this article

International Journal of Technoethics (IJT) is currently edited by Steven Umbrello

More articles in International Journal of Technoethics (IJT) from IGI Global
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journal Editor ().