Alternative Review Screen Design for Electronic Voting Systems
Danae V. Holmes and
Philip Kortum
Additional contact information
Danae V. Holmes: Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
Philip Kortum: Rice University, Houston, TX, USA
International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), 2017, vol. 13, issue 1, 82-99
Abstract:
Verifying a ballot for correctness in an election is a critical task for the voter. Previous work has shown that up to 30% of the ballot can be changed without being noticed by more than half of the voters. In response to this ballot weakness, this study evaluated the usability and viability of alternative ballot verification methods in an electronic voting medium. Three verification methods were tested: end-of-ballot, in-line confirmation, and dual confirmation. In-line and dual confirmation perform similarly to end-of-ballot confirmation in terms of effectiveness. The most efficient method is end-of-ballot review, and dual confirmation produced the longest time spent on the review screen. End-of-ballot confirmation produced the highest satisfaction ratings, though survey results indicated that dual confirmation may be the most appropriate method in terms of voting. Additional research in the field is the next step in exploring these confirmation methods.
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve. ... 018/IJTHI.2017010105 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:igg:jthi00:v:13:y:2017:i:1:p:82-99
Access Statistics for this article
International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI) is currently edited by Anabela Mesquita
More articles in International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI) from IGI Global
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Journal Editor ().